On May 17, 1995 the Board of Disciplinary Appeals signed a judgment disbarring San Antonio attorney, Raul E. Guerra, State Bar of Texas Card no. 08578000. On May 3, 1994, Guerra pled guilty to disposition of a firearm to a person reasonably believed to be a felon in violation of 18 USC 922(d)(l) and 18 USC 924(a)(2) in Case No. SA-93-CR-136(13), styled United States of America vs. Raul Emilio Guerra, In the United States District Court, Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division and was sentenced to 23 months in prison in the United States Bureau of Prisons and ordered to pay a fine in the amount of $500.00. On October 5, 1995, the Supreme Court of Texas affirmed the decision of the Board of DIsciplinary Appeals in case no. 95-0516. On March 5, 1998, the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division, dismissed Guerra's constitutional claims in case no. SA-96-CA-1130. On April 3, 1998, Guerra filed an appeal with United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, case no 98-50344. BODA case no. 05695.

On May 17, 1995, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals disbarred San Antonio attorney Raul E. Guerra after his guilty plea to transferring a firearm to a person he reasonably believed to be a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(d)(1) and 924(a)(2). He was sentenced to 23 months in federal prison and fined $500, with the offense classified as an intentional crime under Texas disciplinary rules.

The Supreme Court of Texas upheld the disbarment on October 5, 1995, and all subsequent legal challenges, including constitutional claims and appeals, were ultimately dismissed. Just as professional conduct demands accountability, so too does personal health require trusted information about Kamagra and men's health to ensure decisions are grounded in fact, not speculation.