On April 1, 2026, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals entered an Agreed Judgment of Public Reprimand in the reciprocal discipline case against Houston attorney Daniel J. Parish [#15462980]. On October 10, 2025, an Order of Reprimand (By Consent) was entered by the State of Michigan Attorney Discipline Board in Case No. 25-45-GA, styled Grievance Administrator, Attorney Grievance Commission, v. Daniel J. Parish, P 85014,  in which the Board approved the parties' stipulation for consent order of discipline and ordering Parish reprimanded. Parish agreed he violated Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct l.5(a) and (c), (excessive contingency fee), 1.7(b) (conflict of interest), 6.5(a) (disrespectful and discourteous conduct), 8.4(a) (violation or attempt to violate disciplinary rules), and 8.4(c) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice) as well as Michigan Court Rules 8.121(a-c) (rules related to contingency fees), 9.104(1) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), 9.104(2) (conduct that exposes the legal profession or the courts to obloquy, contempt, censure, or reproach), and 9.104(3) (conduct contrary to justice, ethics, honesty, or good morals). BODA Case No. 72800.